editor decision started nature rejection

Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. //-->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that . Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? (You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. 1124. Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. A decision by the editor in chief is the . Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Either rejection or sending it out for review. See this document for a full description of what happens after acceptance and before publication. //-->