response to motion to disqualify attorney

/K 1 /Pg 16 0 R /S /P `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n For the reasons that follow, the two motions to disqualify are denied, and the motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) endobj Rule 121 - Local Rules-Statewide Practice Standards, Colo. R - Casetext /P 306 0 R PDF Greenberg traurig opposition to motion to disqualify In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved.10 Below are some important concepts that have emerged in the context of motions to disqualify.11, The Colorado Rules do not bar attorneys from representing current clients against former clients. << /P 12 0 R PDF In the 242nd District Court of Swisher County, Texas << /Pg 17 0 R He also made /S /P /Pg 46 0 R Brown v. Encompass Ins. endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 9 /Annots [] endobj endobj /P 12 0 R << >> The Motion is Granted Without Modification This decision grants SoCalREN's motion without modification. 131 0 obj In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported. >> Notice of Motion and Motion: The . You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj Attorney appointed to represent Peter Angelos denies having conflicts endobj endobj /S /P Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. /Lang (EN-US) >> /Type /Page 297 0 obj 29 0 obj /S /P /P 508 0 R /S /P /S /P >> in writing. << /Pg 29 0 R << endobj >> /S /P /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /Pg 17 0 R >> Co. of Am., No. /K 34 /S /Reference /S /P endobj 167 0 obj /S /P endobj 126 0 obj endobj Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. 103 0 obj >> 0000002381 00000 n /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 35 0 R /Pg 20 0 R Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty. << 81 0 obj /K 1 (See Defendant's Motion Exhibit 2.) << /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> /S /P 289 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) endobj 362 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI 269 0 obj << << /S /P /Rotate 0 endobj /P 290 0 R /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') << /Pg 41 0 R /Parent 7 0 R 318 0 R null 319 0 R 123 0 R 320 0 R 123 0 R 321 0 R 123 0 R] endobj /P 508 0 R /K 47 /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R /Tabs /S /S /Link /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 27 0 R While the government takes exception to the defendant's statement of "facts" in his Motion, it is evident that neither prosecutor Rosman nor Sharp was a witness to any events that occurred on June 21, 1995, before they met with the defendant. 0000001952 00000 n endobj 335 0 obj << /S /Table 1. << 138 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 16 0 R /S /P >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 14 /K 3 endobj endobj endobj Once a motion to disqualify the judge in question has been filed, the judge will be served a copy of the affidavit. 11 [110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] >> /S /P 85 0 obj 3. endobj An attorney for Louis Angelos had sought to disqualify Rosenberg, citing his "animus" against Peter Angelos' law firm, which is among the assets whose fate is in dispute within the family . 21 0 obj Motion to Disqualify an Attorney for Florida State Circuit Court /Pg 19 0 R /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] << /K 0 /P 12 0 R /Type /Page 365 0 obj 0000009504 00000 n /Tabs /S MOTIONS DISQUALIFY LITIGATION - State Bar of Texas /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 29 /Pg 16 0 R /Tabs /S 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R endobj 203 0 obj endobj >> endobj /Pg 25 0 R endobj A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] . /Type /Page /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /P 288 0 R /K 10 /S /Reference /Parent 9 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << 166 0 obj /K 19 HarrisT19@michigan.gov . /Lang (EN-US) << *243 In addition, the motion was not timely. +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn >> << /S /P 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 >> 1 18 U.S.C. /Rotate 0 >> >> << /K 3 /Pg 18 0 R /S /P /P 528 0 R 00016 Brian Frost Response to Motion to Disqualify Pigg - Google /P 304 0 R << /P 531 0 R 123 0 obj endobj /S /P 121 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R !location.countrycode?location.countryName :location.officeName }}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).languageCode | uppercase}}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).name}}. /P 12 0 R >> endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P 237 0 obj Ensure that the info you add to the Motion To Disqualify Counsel Sample Texas is up-to-date and accurate. 75 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 22 0 R endobj 177 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R << >> Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. endobj >> By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al. /Lang (EN-US) endobj Affidavit to Disqualify or Recuse Judge for Prejudice - US Legal Forms /S /H1 endobj 292 0 obj Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage. 325 0 obj /K 9 Instead, Colo. RPC 1.9(a) provides that, [a] lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that persons interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /K 2 However, disqualification is a harsh measure. /P 12 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /A 520 0 R 93 0 obj Co. of Wausau, No. Defendant's Motion at 1. << /K 38 >> People v. Nozolino, 298 P.3d 915, 919 (Colo. 2013) (Disqualification of a partys chosen attorney is an extreme remedy and is only appropriate where required to preserve the integrity and fairness of the judicial proceedings.) (citation omitted). /K 14 /S /H1 /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 21 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Annots [] /Pg 15 0 R >> /Pg 26 0 R >> /Length 532 0 R 2. /P 55 0 R /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Count 5 69 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 125 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) >> Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> << 438 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R endobj /P 284 0 R 16 0 obj >> 341 0 obj /S /TOCI endobj endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 0 0000006483 00000 n Mark White, Esq. /StructParents 12 This written response must be filed within two days after the motion to disqualify was . /Pg 19 0 R 51 0 obj /S /P /Type /Page endobj endobj PDF context motions.'" In response to C.H.'s argument that F had not /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 1 /. /Tabs /S >> /P 12 0 R endobj endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) << By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. 127 0 obj /P 509 0 R /Resources 456 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 16 0 R /Rotate 0 endobj << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Underline /Span 236 0 obj The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. endobj An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. /Pg 15 0 R /Annots [] >> /K [1 326 0 R 15] /S /Reference /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R >> Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. << /Pg 39 0 R /StructParents 25 /Pg 30 0 R >> 122 0 obj /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 15 0 R /K 6 7. << << /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 18 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /S /P /S /TOCI /A 524 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /TOCI /Tabs /S 246 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 44 0 R 4 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /MarkInfo 2 0 R /S /Reference 99 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R Motions - Utah Courts >> >> /K 16 /Pg 44 0 R /K [22 285 0 R 24] /S /P /P 509 0 R endobj /Pg 16 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /K 4 /S /P Woodard v. Dist. 184 0 obj endobj /Pg 17 0 R /S /P filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. /Type /Page << 324 0 R null 325 0 R 132 0 R 326 0 R 134 0 R] << /Contents [487 0 R 488 0 R 489 0 R] << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 19 0 R Thus, any alleged confidential or proprietary information that he may have obtained would be obsolete. /Lang (EN-US) << endobj 17 0 obj /Type /Page << /Resources 375 0 R 114 0 obj /S /Link /K 16 /P 509 0 R endobj /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 44 0 R endobj << >> << endobj NME's motion was based on the confidences that it had imparted to the attorney in the prior representation under a joint defense agreement. >> Here, two FBI agents were present during the defendant's meeting with the prosecutors and are available to testify as to what took place during the meeting. /Pg 30 0 R << You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. United States v. Ashman, 979 F.2d at 494; United States v. Roberson, 897 F.2d 1092, 1098 (11th Cir. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /P 506 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. /S /P /P 12 0 R >> /K 27 endobj 330 0 obj Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Exclude /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 32 0 R endobj 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R /Rotate 0 /Pg 16 0 R /S /Reference endobj << 336 0 obj LAi7p:0qX t` P7SP.X8v('bsX.LC8p) iV 3C4=H0u2Fd Cg. /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Fill out the forms. /Pg 45 0 R /Resources 474 0 R >> << 2:11-cv-03473-CBM-MAN (Aug. 26, 2014) (motion to disqualify Squire Patton Boggs), www.law360.com/dockets/download/53fdfac81101ea655a00000b?doc_ url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.cacd.uscourts. /StructParents 5 As the prosecutors have no personal knowledge of the events prior to their meeting with the defendant, they are not material witnesses to those events and should not be called to testify. /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 186 0 obj << >> /P 55 0 R >> /K 18 /P 12 0 R endobj /K 2 Northwoods Educational Foundation, Inc.'S Reply to Plaintiff'S Response endobj /Pg 16 0 R % /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 97 0 obj SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /Pg 29 0 R 161 0 obj This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /S /P endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R /P 531 0 R endobj >> /K 2 /K 10 /S /P << /S /P /S /P /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 193 0 obj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P 37 0 obj /RoleMap 14 0 R /S /P 108 0 obj endobj /K 15 endobj /Pg 16 0 R /K 3 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R 52 0 obj /P 12 0 R >> endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 /Pg 19 0 R 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] /Resources 462 0 R 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] /Pg 21 0 R << endobj Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing /S /P << 124 0 obj /S /P Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. /Lang (EN-US) %%EOF >> 169 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PRESIDING OFFICER, AND MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY I, Adam C. Sloane, hereby state that: 1. /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 29 /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 27 0 R 13. /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference << By letter dated June 10, 1997, the defendant made a demand pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 13 0 obj ________________________ United States District Judge. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is GRANTED and Andrew J. Cevasco, Esquire is disqualified pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 from serving as legal counsel for the Defendants at the trial in this matter; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to R. 1:5-1(a) that a copy of this Order will be /Pg 16 0 R /P 505 0 R /Pg 28 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R >> /Count 32 endobj /K 23 << /Pg 23 0 R For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . /Pg 24 0 R /P 55 0 R endobj endobj /K 0 /P 508 0 R 340 0 obj << << /S /P /S /P /S /P /Pg 38 0 R /Tabs /S /K 10 disqualify the plaintiff's attorney in a suit in which the attor-ney's former 6client was not a party. /K 6 /P 508 0 R /K 2 0000000016 00000 n /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 29 0 R 10 0 obj 267 0 obj at 390-91. << << motion to disqualify for a hearing. << endobj /K 8 /P 56 0 R endobj /K 3 /P 55 0 R /P 12 0 R As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process. >> /P 81 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 45 0 R /S /P 345 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /H2 << /P 505 0 R /S /H1 /K 0 /Pg 37 0 R /S /P ECF No. 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 19 /P 12 0 R 170 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Chart /Figure << 111 0 obj /K 43 /K [18 283 0 R 20] /S /Link A Judge should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding where he or she: Has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party; . DONE AND ENTERED THIS _________ day of ____________ , 1997. /Contents [396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R] 77 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 326 0 obj /S /P endobj /Pg 22 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P Federal courts have the inherent power to supervise the professional conduct of attorneys appearing before the courts, which includes the authority to disqualify an attorney. endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 509 0 R /K 4 /Pg 18 0 R /P 528 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 260 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. 38 0 obj endobj 220 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R hb```e``Z B@1V ,$pyLqLY TZ Rktz xp;9FjeNA @+U}`D a IsA b1 5g1160g\ $]/4OWuu/Nbbpy*+# @q@l ==*FK = /Lang (EN-US) /Filter /FlateDecode PDF J-a23009-21 Matthew Darrow in The Superior Court of Pennsylvania Ppl /Lang (EN-US) << <> /Pg 34 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /P 505 0 R /Tabs /S In denying the defendants' motion, the court relied on the fact that there were other investigating agents present at the meeting who could testify to what occurred during the meeting. on January 7, 2002. /Type /Page /S /P /Pg 17 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. /S /P 113 0 obj >> /S /Footnote 35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R << 2022 California Rules of Court. endobj /S /Link /S /Link /P 163 0 R Myers v. Porter (In re Estate of Myers), 130 P.3d 1023, 1025 (Colo. 2006). endobj Serve the other party . /S /P /Rotate 0 /S /H1 /S /P endobj 152 0 obj 313 0 obj >> << /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 17 0 R Motion to Disqualify Trial Judge: - Thomas M. Bates 24 0 obj >> at 391; United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. endobj /Lang (EN-US) << 467 0 obj << /S /P /Pg 22 0 R >> /Pg 15 0 R /K 26 /K 1 The Ethics of Moving to Disqualify Opposing Counsel for Conflict of 168 0 obj /P 509 0 R 14 0 obj See. /Pg 18 0 R /K 5 /S /P These motions are becoming ever more common. /Lang (EN-US) The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /P 133 0 R 118 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R endobj /S /P /K 7 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 190 0 R endobj 31 0 obj Sharp, and the response of the United States. << /S /P >> >> Opposing a Motion Filed Against You - Family Law Self-Help Center /Pg 17 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /TOC << << << endobj /Pages 3 0 R /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] /S /P 192 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R << /Pg 37 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 6. >> /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R Petitioner also filed a pretrial motion seeking to disqualify the Broward County State Attorney's Office from prosecuting him and asking the court to dismiss the indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct. See Alps Prop., 526 F. Supp. >> /K 42 >> /Pg 17 0 R << /S /P /S /P endobj /K 11 << 73 0 obj /P 12 0 R the matters involved in both representations are substantially related, and. /P 12 0 R /Parent 10 0 R /Pg 15 0 R >> /P 4 0 R >> endobj /K 31 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 440 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /P 124 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /S /P /Annots [412 0 R 413 0 R 414 0 R] << endobj endobj >> /Count 5 1 / Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have no authority to testify until the procedures set forth in 28 C.F.R. << endobj Rule 2.160(c) provides as follows: (c) Motion. /Parent 10 0 R 355 0 obj Disqualification must be complete and a judge cannot partially disqualify or recuse themselves. >> /S /P endobj >> >> >> endobj << /K 0 /Type /Page /P 12 0 R 53 0 obj << endobj << /Parent 10 0 R >> << endobj << 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /Pg 37 0 R /Contents [408 0 R 409 0 R 410 0 R] endobj << << /K 8 startxref /K [5 512 0 R] 78 0 obj /K 2 /S /P 132 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R R. Evid. APG/Z=p L_uQ7EVr+MHIRh2)Qg^HWjBY:],h(8BToqSirY[DHWBo~djX$dXS&U.uJ%Tj )].fm_ujmbzY'f}hHm=r5[9Bm^wcrz7zW>~/N << 292 0 R null 294 0 R 295 0 R 294 0 R null 296 0 R 297 0 R 296 0 R null endobj /Pg 20 0 R >> << endobj Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. /S /P >> >> 0000002183 00000 n << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R] 248 0 obj 190 0 obj 0000006178 00000 n /K 4 endobj 160 0 obj endobj /S /P >> See Rule 2.330 (f). 233 0 obj <> endobj /Annots [] << /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 19 173 0 obj /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] >> << /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P Others are nothing more than a litigation tactic, forcing attorneys to scramble to protect valued client relationships. /Pg 33 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> << /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /K [2 329 0 R 9 330 0 R 11] Rule 8.54. In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved. /Pg 44 0 R He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002. are satisfied. /Pg 19 0 R /P 529 0 R << /Pg 30 0 R Colo. RPC 1.9 does not define a substantially related matter,. endobj endobj /S /P /K 9 302 0 obj In New York, that motion requires: the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship between the moving party and opposing counsel. 10 [106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R] >> /Pg 15 0 R /S /P 14 [123 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R null 315 0 R 316 0 R 315 0 R null 317 0 R null /K [10 314 0 R 12] << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 187 0 obj 142 0 obj /P 529 0 R /K 0 /P 300 0 R /Contents [453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] Peters v. Dist. << 253 0 obj >> >> For example, if you need more time to answer a complaint or petition, you can file a motion to extend the time to answer. /K 13 Mar. << /Lang (EN-US) >> >> << /P 12 0 R Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. /K 0 These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Dentons - Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify 5 0 obj >> 208 0 obj /P 12 0 R 57 0 obj endobj /S /P /K 30 endobj /S /P << /S /P /K 28 /Parent 3 0 R >> << << /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 3 >> endobj /Tabs /S endobj /K 1 1. 89 0 obj endobj /Annots [] /Pg 15 0 R endobj /K 27 /P 286 0 R /P 12 0 R << 275 0 obj PDF Attorney for Petitioner - Washington State Courts Washington Courts /Pg 16 0 R << northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions /K 14 >> 61 0 obj endobj /Annots [] 290 0 obj endobj >> The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /K 1 /P 531 0 R << endobj /Contents [463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] 218 0 obj The Texas Supreme Court held that disqualification was proper, reasoning endobj /Rotate 0 /P 12 0 R << /Pg 45 0 R /Superscript /Span << /Type /Page 82 0 obj /S /P /P 12 0 R Attorney General . to the subject matter of this litigation. << /Rotate 0 >> /P 278 0 R /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] 7 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R 90 0 obj /P 508 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << >> /S /P /P 529 0 R /Rotate 0 /Parent 11 0 R endobj /A 499 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Pages One party may insist that the court bar the lawyer from representing another party through a motion to disqualify. /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> 70 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 302 0 R null] >> << /Pg 15 0 R << Two important pre-motion strategies are effective. position as district attorney. /K [8 510 0 R] /Parent 11 0 R 71 0 obj (a) A court that determines that a person has signed a pleading or motion in violation of Section 10.001may impose a sanction on the person, a party represented by the person, or both. endobj /K 2 /StructParents 27 /K 13 << /Pg 45 0 R endobj << /Type /Page /Pg 16 0 R 330 0 R 162 0 R] << /K 4 >> 0000006588 00000 n /S /TOC 19 0 obj /K 7 This motion to disqualify is based on a single and brief telephone call in October 2007 for which there is neither a record nor an estimate of duration by Chinois counsel. << 338 0 obj PDF FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSldN - Supreme Court of Florida << /Contents [483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R] /S /P /Pg 38 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /S /P << /Pg 16 0 R /StructParents 32 /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference /P 12 0 R /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] /Type /Page /S /P >> /K 2 /S /Reference /Lang (EN-US) Attorneys should not assume that possession of mere playbook knowledge precludes disqualification. /S /P /P 509 0 R endobj 285 0 obj << /S /P /S /P /S /TOCI /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 231 0 obj endobj /Pg 17 0 R /P 508 0 R >> endobj In Sacramento, the . /S /P . 258 0 obj 0 /Contents [419 0 R 420 0 R 421 0 R] 28 0 obj /K 3 /Tabs /S /StructParents 14 /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 37 0 R /StructParents 21 endobj >> /Pg 16 0 R endobj /K 8 /P 509 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Rm. /K [14 516 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. /Pg 16 0 R 210 0 obj Despite the Attorney General's best attempts to cast himself a super- /Annots [] << >> << /Pg 22 0 R >> << >> /K 0 /Parent 11 0 R /Tabs /S [18 -1] at 19. /Pg 33 0 R 163 0 obj >> /K 7 28 [169 0 R 170 0 R] 358 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj << endobj /P 506 0 R >> 198 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /H3 endobj /P 12 0 R California Rules of Court: Title Eight Rules /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI /P 12 0 R 155 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference TENORIO v. NEVADA | Case No. 2:20-cv-00517-ART | 20230227a19| Leagle.com endobj /P 12 0 R /Pg 46 0 R endobj /Pg 45 0 R /Kids [15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R] 232 0 obj >> However, by understanding the underpinnings of this ethical issue, attorneys will be better prepared to anticipate, respond to, or even avoid motions to disqualify. 0000009358 00000 n >> << /K 1 << 34 0 obj /K 6 /K 9 /Type /Page /P 12 0 R /Pg 16 0 R Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). /Lang (EN-US) endobj 46 0 obj << /S /H3 << /Lang (EN-US) 324 0 obj endobj

Hechizo Del Nombre En El Zapato, Loflin Funeral Home, Ramseur Obituaries, Busted Mugshots Davidson County, Nc, 1914 Band Nsbm, Articles R